Office Politics: The Basics for Private Employers

In case you haven’t noticed the yard signs popping up like mushrooms, the constant barrage of television and radio advertisements, or the unsolicited text messages from unknown numbers, we are in the homestretch of election season. For those employers with questions on how to handle political speech in the workplace, especially during the last few days before (and hopefully not much beyond) Election Day, here is a refresher on the basics for private employers.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prevents the government from enacting laws to prohibit the free exercise of speech and assembly, among other liberties. It does not apply to private employers. Where there is no state action involved, there is no unfettered right to free speech in a private place of employment. Quite simply, a private employer can enact rules to keep political expression from its workplace. Some employers prohibit political speech in the workplace to avoid potential disruptions to business operations, customer relations, or employee morale.

If an employer adopts a policy concerning political expression and messaging, it must do so fairly and consistently, and it should be inclusive and consistent to avoid the perception of favoritism or discrimination. In other words, if an employer requires Meghan to remove her Kamala button, it should also direct Dennis not to wear his Trump t-shirt. Remote workers are still “in the workplace” when they participate in virtual meetings, so there are no separate rules for them.

When enacting rules about political expression and messaging in the workplace, private employers should of course remain aware of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which applies to both union and non-union settings, and among other things protects employees’ ability to engage in concerted activity or to discuss the terms and conditions of their employment. Therefore, private employers must be mindful of a potential nexus or overlap between employees’ political speech and discussion of working conditions. Under the NLRA, for instance, employees may distribute information during non-working time about a candidate’s stance on a particular issue that may also constitute a complaint about the employees’ working conditions.

© Copyright Babst, Calland, Clements and Zomnir, P.C. by: Janet K. Meub of Babst, Calland, Clements & Zomnir, P.C. For more on Political Speech, visit the NLR Constitutional Law section.

  • Related Posts

    Website Use of Third-Party Tracking Software Not Prohibited Under Massachusetts Wiretap Act

    The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, the state’s highest appellate court, recently held that website operators’ use of third-party tracking software, including Meta Pixel and Google Analytics, is not prohibited…

    Department of Labor’s New Overtime Rule Overturned by Federal Court in Texas

    On November 15, 2024, in State of Texas v. Dep’t of Labor, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas overturned a Department of Labor rule that would have increased…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Dow Jones Today: Futures Little Changed as Stocks on Pace for Weekly Gains; Bitcoin Nears $100,000

    • By admin
    • November 22, 2024
    • 0 views
    Dow Jones Today: Futures Little Changed as Stocks on Pace for Weekly Gains; Bitcoin Nears $100,000

    Oil heads for weekly gains as Ukraine war intensifies

    • By admin
    • November 22, 2024
    • 1 views
    Oil heads for weekly gains as Ukraine war intensifies

    Oil Heads for Weekly Advance as Russia-Ukraine War Escalates

    • By admin
    • November 22, 2024
    • 1 views
    Oil Heads for Weekly Advance as Russia-Ukraine War Escalates

    State Bank’s Hedges Cap Indian Borrowing Costs as Economy Slows

    • By admin
    • November 22, 2024
    • 2 views
    State Bank’s Hedges Cap Indian Borrowing Costs as Economy Slows

    Trump considers Warsh for Treasury Secretary and later Fed chairman, WSJ reports

    • By admin
    • November 22, 2024
    • 2 views
    Trump considers Warsh for Treasury Secretary and later Fed chairman, WSJ reports

    Website Use of Third-Party Tracking Software Not Prohibited Under Massachusetts Wiretap Act

    • By admin
    • November 22, 2024
    • 3 views
    Website Use of Third-Party Tracking Software Not Prohibited Under Massachusetts Wiretap Act